Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrick Brady vs Joshua Goodger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brady vs Goodger analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Brady vs Joshua Goodger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brady 1 - 0 Goodger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brady has won 43.69% of points on his second serve, while Goodger has won 43.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brady, in recent form, has won 52.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Goodger has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.45% and 30.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brady has saved 46.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goodger has saved 60.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brady has won 54.05% of matches played (W/L 20/ 17), with Goodger winning 29.17% (W/L 7/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brady has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Goodger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Brady has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10), where as Goodger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.17% of matches (W/L 7/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brady winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brady winning 2 and Goodger winning 0. The last match between Brady and Goodger was at the M25 Loughborough, 08-01-2024, Q3, I.hard with Patrick Brady getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brady and Goodger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brady winning 0 times and Goodger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Brady winning 1, and Goodger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brady has played against opponents with an average rank of 385.35 while Goodger has played against players with an average rank of 186.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brady has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goodger has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brady has converted 40.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goodger has converted 38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brady 1 - 0 Goodger
757
Rank
728
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
821
Rank
821
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
53% (40-36)
Career Total W/L
47% (38-43)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patrick Brady | Joshua Goodger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (52/66) | 62% (48/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (35/52) | 56% (27/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (7/14) | 45% (13/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (37/77) | 36% (24/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrick Brady | Joshua Goodger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 36% (5/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (108/106) | 48% (77/83) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 320.45 | 187.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (501/707) | 65% (283/436) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (327/501) | 68% (192/283) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (90/206) | 46% (71/153) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (31/77) | 46% (11/24) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (290/683) | 35% (135/381) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 33% (2/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (6/10) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 25% (4/1) |
Patrick Brady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Patrick Brady
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Lucas Gerch
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Collin Altamirano
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Jaimee Floyd Angele
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Patrick Brady
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Patrick Brady
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
15 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33
Total Points Won
35
|
4-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Patrick Brady
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
80%
(
86 of
107)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
86)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Joshua Goodger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Demetris Azoides
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Loxley
Player
Joshua Goodger
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(3) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
David Quayle
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Joshua Goodger
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petros Chrysochos
Player
Joshua Goodger
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Joshua Goodger
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(12) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Brady Vs Goodger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
